Anybody Work For Mac

• Anybody Work For Macmillan

As long as you can install and run java, you should be ok with running JGecko on a MAC. I don't think you can run the Zelda trainers on a MAC though, because you need the DOT NET framework installed. And that is a Microsoft framework. But like I said, you can run JGeckoU, since its developed using Java, and most of the codes that are used in those trainers, are posted on cosmocortney's website. Here is cosmocortney's website - You can use those codes with JGeckoU.

JGeckoU - How to install Java on MAC - Why not create a Virtual Machine in MAC, and install Windows in the VM? Maybe that way you can run the Zelda Trainers? I have never tried it though, but it may work.

I'm selling my 2009 Mac Mini (4 GB, 500 GB Drive) and thinking about buying the Mac Mini Server and striping the drives. I've got onsite and offsite backups. Upgrading will get me a faster processor ( 2.5 vs 2.0 ) and a much faster drive with RAID. I already have an external DVD so that's no problem. I really have no use for OS X server. While it would be cool to run OS X server, the problem is in a year or so when I have to upgrade.

Can anybody get the Managerzone 3d match engine to work on PPc mac - Answered by a verified Mac Support Specialist We use cookies to give you the best possible experience on our website. By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies on your device as described in our cookie policy unless you have disabled them. As long as you can install and run java, you should be ok with running JGecko on a MAC. I don't think you can run the Zelda trainers on a MAC though, because you need the DOT NET framework installed. And that is a Microsoft framework. But like I said, you can run JGeckoU, since its developed using. I tried 3 different browsers (Safari, Chrome, Firefox) and all of them fail in unique ways. Anyone had any luck? I’m going to give it a whirl on a windows box at work tomorrow.

Pricey upgrade. The refurbed Mini servers were in stock Friday, but I wanted to wait until Tuesday to see if the minis were updated along with the MacBooks, iMacs, and whatever else. Anyone have a 2.5 GHz Mini or work with the Mini Server? Quote yFilliam H. Muffman I do not think the mini will be updated for a while, like maybe August when it will get a Core i3.

MacBook Tuesday, then a couple of weeks later for the Mac Pro. What are you doing with a mini that you are always waiting for the CPU? Sometimes I'll peg the CPU.

The main benefits are 25% faster, much higher data transfers, a new machine, for about couple hundred dollars. I have the opportunity to sell my mini for a good price so I'm thinking about grabbing the fastest mini available. I appreciate all of the replies.

Quote Doc Is your Mini one with Intel graphics or with Nvidia graphics? If yours uses Intel graphics then an upgrade might be smart. If yours has Nvidia graphics or if you buy a current Mini then I suggest that you connect a fast drive via FireWire 800 instead of RAIDing. I have the 2009 model with nvidia graphics. I already have a drobo on the FW. I just read a review and striping the drives give a huge transfer increase; well above a single FW800 drive. Your experience with the Drobo is not a good indicator.

They are notoriously slow. With a fast drive on FW 800 the real-world difference is probably 5-15MB/s at the most and with overhead and fragmentation, there's little or no practical difference at all on a Mini. If you really need to tweak it that carefully for maximum speed, you should probably be looking at Mac Pros, not Minis. Quote silvarios I've seen benchmarks of 80MB/s for FW800.

But yes, RAID 0 on the internal SATA bus will be much faster. Which brings us to the next fun option: Run a cable out to an external 3.5-inch eSATA drive. Then you can approach the full speed of the drive. You should be able to shave the edges off the SATA side of a flat SATA/eSATA connecting cable and run the cable through one of the vents in the back.

Some people use a Dremel to widen the security slot for the mod, but physical alteration of the case is almost certainly not necessary. Quote DRR Contrast that with internal RAID over SATA I, which would give you much more headroom - 375MB/s in a 2 drive configuration.

I haven't seen speeds that fast in the various benchmarks. Nathan Me either.I only got around 270 in a 4 disk RAID 5. To clarify - I was talking about the interface throughput potential with a two disk striped RAID, not actual disk performance. Was merely illustrating that disks are now faster than FW800, but will never be as fast as SATA striped RAID. You will never be able to saturate with SATA striped RAID because every time you add a disk, you have to add a new interface - you'll never saturate the bus. Quote DRR You will never be able to saturate with SATA striped RAID because every time you add a disk, you have to add a new interface - you'll never saturate the bus. Some of the new SSDs have hit the limit.

They do not reach full speed unless they are connected to a SATA 6 Gbps controller, something Intel is not going to put on their motherboard until 2011. There is also an issue with where the SATA controller is in the system architecture. There is a throughput limitation on disk performance on older machines because they only use two PCI-x lanes. Putting more than two SSDs can run up against the limit.

Anybody Work For Macmillan

The mini is not affected because it only has two SATA connectors and you would run up against the SATA bus limit before hitting the north bridge limit. url=Zee Maps Now requires a subscription/payment to workMRF User Map/url.